K.Charles III was awarded many new titles following the recent death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, but one of the existing titles that remains is ‘Royal Guardian’. Faculty of Homeopathyis an organization of medical practitioners who also practice pseudoscientific forms of medicine. And the new king’s ties to alternative medicine go beyond this patronage and play with alternative medicine. As Prince Charles ascends to the throne, experts ponder his impact on British medicine as Prince of Wales and how he will influence British alternative medicine as monarch in the future.
Ezard Ernsta retired academic physician who specializes in complementary and alternative medicine research at the University of Exeter and has published his books Charles, Alternate Prince Earlier this year, the scientist What King Charles is ‘very interested in [alternative medicine]Because such high-profile attention may have fostered support for Ernst’s own research, if the alternative treatment holds scientific merit. [the king] I’m not really interested in research, but I would like to use alternative medicine as much as possible in our NHS and in global medicine,” says Ernst.
Famous Prince Charles Said In 2010, he said he was “proud” of being accused of being an “enemy of the Enlightenment,” an 18th-century social movement in which science and evidence-based reasoning flourished.Interest in alternative medicine likely shared with King Charles’ parents, says David Colhouna pharmacologist at University College London, writes about King on his blog.The unlikely science of DCColquhoun points to the Queen herself, formerly patron of the ‘Royal London Homeopathic Hospital’ (now renamed ‘Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine’).The hospital’s medical director, Peter Fisher, is the daughter of Queen Elizabeth II. homeopathic doctor for at least 15 years.
However, Ernst said that, as far as he knows, the Queen has never made a statement in favor of homeopathy or alternative medicine, which is a “huge difference” with the King.Ernst says that his criticism was not placed on the king’s personal use of homeopathy, but that “as soon as he became seriously ill in any way, he felt that conventional remedies could be offered.” Get the best medicine. Gerson therapy (attempts to treat cancer with fruit juice and coffee instead of chemotherapy), marma therapy, pulse diagnosis, and reflexology (“alternative treatments lacking evidence and plausibility,” as Ernst puts it)-his and others of people are particularly critical of health care policies for good reason.
Pseudoscience Lobbying
Ernst says the “most obvious” instance in which King Charles sought to influence the spread of alternative medicine was a letter he sent to a British politician. lobbying For pseudoscientific therapy. As is known, these “black spider notes” were a collection of letters sent by then-Prince Charles to ministers in various British government departments. GuardianThe publication of the spider memo required a UK Supreme Court ruling, notes Michael Marshall, project director for the Good Thinking Society. “Charles wrote a lobbying letter, [National Health Service (NHS)] For the ineffective drugs he tried to hide,” says Marshall the scientist“He was very keen to use his influence opaquely.”
Also included in the memo letter In 2007, it was sent to then-Secretary of Health Alan Johnson. In his letter, the crown prince at the time wrote that “there is more that can be done to access complementary medicine” and that “the treatment of disease should be ‘holistic’ rather than ‘reductionist’ focused.” You write that you need an approach. specific illness. “This echoes the popular pro-homeopathic argument for framing the practice as being more holistic than using pharmaceuticals. His goal was clear,” he says, Ernst. “It became very clear that he was pushing politicians (Tony Blair, the Secretary of Health and others) to use more alternative treatments in the NHS.”
Charles cannot stop progress, but he certainly impedes it.
—Ezard Ernst
Prince Charles even gave up secrecy to openly support alternative medicine on the world stage. In 1982 he critical remarks In honor of the 150th anniversary of the British Medical Association (BMA), where he was just appointed president.King Charles also founded charity, founded in 1993 by the Foundation for Integrative Health (FIH), to explore “how safe and proven complementary therapies work in tandem with mainstream medicine.”according to blog post According to Ernst, the foundation has also worked with medical schools to “enhance the understanding of complementary approaches among new physicians.”
Then in 2006 speech King Charles has urged practitioners of orthodox medicine to learn from alternative medicine to the World Health Organization in Geneva. The speech also drew criticism from doctors, who warned that alternative medicine could be promoted and practiced despite the lack of supporting evidence.
Four years later, in 2010, FIH closed Among allegations of fraud and money laundering. criminal investigation, belief Foundation financial director George Gray’s medical school was born from the foundation’s ashes right after thatin a promotional slideshow that said it was “a new strategy to advance Prince Charles’ vision” and “an evolution of his foundation for the work of integrative medicine to date.” Medical College and Department of General Health, as it is now called, aims to “redefine medicine beyond drugs and procedures” and to “use both conventional and non-conventional approaches to health.” As of 2021, the king is still patron of the Faculty of Medicine and the Faculty of Integrative Health. As of the publication of this article, neither the College of Medicine and the College of Integrative Medicine, nor the Clarence House, which handles inquiries from the press about Charles III, have responded. the scientistrequest for comment.
Despite the many ways King Charles tried to influence the popularization of alternative medicine, did his work have much effect? No, says Ernst. “He tried very hard and persistently, but he didn’t have much success.”
Ernst notes that when the King “started to promote alternative medicine in Britain, there were five homeopathic hospitals. Today there are none.” Treatment is not paid for by the NHS. Yet he says, “Charles cannot stop progress, but he certainly hinders it.”
But King Charles likely influenced veterinary medicinesays Marshall, pointing out that King Charles advocated the use of homeopathy for farm animals. use homeopathy instead‘ said Marshall, adding the king’s claim that his cows would not get mastitis. thanks to homeopathic remedies Homeopathy does not help cows, but “the farm owner is probably persuasive”. It is the fact that the farm is a clean farm, which means the cows are less likely to live in conditions that put them at risk of infection.Charles attributes it to homeopathy, but in fact his animals It should be attributed to the level of care and attention received.”
look “Review: Homeopathy doesn’t help livestock”
Also, a letter from Prince Charles to Tony Blair in 2005 may have influenced regulations on labeling of herbal medicines. In 2004, an EU directive declared that herbal remedies cannot be marketed without approval by the regulatory authorities of certain Member States.in him letter Prince Charles at the time wrote to Tony Blair: I think we all agreed that this is cracking nuts with a sledgehammer. Marshall said it is unclear to what extent lobbying by the King and industry players played a role, but ultimately the standard of evidence required by the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) was met. He says he weakened in 2006. Change to regulation.At the time the letter was written, Charles owns Duchy Originals, a company that manufactures herbal remedies, and in 2009 criticized In response to misleading advertisements claiming that the company’s products can remove toxins from the body, made to fix They have since stopped selling the herbal remedy.
Now that Charles is king, Ernst hopes he will be less vocal on the topic of alternative medicine. The power will be so great that you can expect to pull strings behind the scenes.” Marshall also suggests that King Charles may not offer a personal opinion on the matter. It can be difficult to tell if he continues to lobby behind the scenes, Marshall warns. No, or he continues to champion various pet interests, but is even more opaque.
