United States District Court
October 4, 2022
When the administrative law judge found that the plaintiff was not disabled for social security purposes, the plaintiff’s allegation that the ALJ erred by giving little weight to the opinion of the plaintiff’s mental health care provider. That finding should be upheld regardless. “Tina Marie Bird (“Plaintiff”) brings this action pursuant to 42 USC §405(g) and…
Enter your username and password in the fields above to access subscriber content on this site.
Your subscription includes one set of login credentials that are unique to you. This site has built-in security features. If someone signs in with your credentials while you’re logged in, the ongoing login will be automatically closed by the site and you won’t be able to access it at that point.
For group subscriptions or enterprise site licenses for your company, please contact Sian Taylor.
If you believe your login credentials are being used by someone else, please contact Customer Service at 877-615-9536 to change your password.
Already a paying subscriber but not yet registered for online access? Click here to learn how to get Premium Web Access.
