Health Care Premiums Could Go Up Fast If Republicans Don’t Act

This article is part of HuffPost’s biweekly politics newsletter. Click here to subscribe.

Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans have made the high cost of living a major focus of their 2024 campaign. And while they have scathingly attacked Democrats on issues like crime and immigration, their pledge to lower the prices of everyday life may have enabled them. to win control of the White House and Congress.

But governing is harder than campaigning. The president-elect and other Republicans could see their pledges to lower prices collide with opposition to government spending on health care and, just as important, opposition to so-called Obamacare. expensive.

It will happen within the next few months, or perhaps even weeks. a find A Congressional Budget Office release Thursday shows why.

The findings concern the cost of health insurance for people who purchase private insurance through the Affordable Care Act, a landmark bill passed by Democrats and signed by then-President Barack Obama in 2010. there were. The CBO’s conclusion, in short, is that insurance will cover millions of Americans. If Republicans don’t act, the costs will be even higher.

The long version looks like this: These millions of people purchase insurance directly through the Affordable Care Act Marketplace, HealthCare.gov, and state-run analogs like Covered California. I can’t get insurance through my job.

When you purchase through the Marketplace, you can qualify for tax credits that effectively reduce your insurance premiums by hundreds or even thousands of dollars a year. But when the Affordable Care Act was first enacted, these tax credits were smaller than the law’s authors had hoped because there were not enough votes in Congress to fund more generous assistance. It was small. This is a big reason why so many people continued to struggle with high costs or simply didn’t have insurance at all during the early stages of the program.

That all changed in 2021, when President Joe Biden and Democrats temporarily increased subsidies with additional funding. The first impetus was the coronavirus pandemic. Doing whatever it takes to help people pay their medical bills seemed like a particularly good idea in the midst of a public health crisis. But there was always a second motive. It’s about making insurance available through the Affordable Care Act more affordable.

The impact of expanding tax credits is clear. As insurance became cheaper on the market, enrollment surged to record levels. However, the additional subsidies are scheduled to disappear after 2025. Democrats are pushing for an extension of the aid, but it’s up to President Trump and Republicans in Congress to extend it.

It’s not the kind of thing they want to do, but Thursday’s CBO findings give them new reason to think about it.

In response to research from four Democrats on Capitol Hill, CBO analysts determined that allowing the additional subsidies to expire would cause premiums to rise 4% in 2026 and nearly 8% in each year thereafter. (CBO analysts predict this change will take two years to fully take effect.)

Due to the way premiums and tax credits interact, the increase isIf you purchase insurance through the Marketplace, you will incur additional out-of-pocket costs of approximately $700 per person per year. Gideon LukensA senior researcher at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities told HuffPost.

Some buyers will simply pay higher costs or move to a less generous insurance plan, while others will drop coverage altogether. That’s why, according to CBO estimates that the number of uninsured Americans is expected to increase by 2.2 million in 2026 and nearly 4 million in each subsequent year.

CBO’s forecasts, like all forecasts, can be wrong. But they are consistent otherindependent estimate. And there are good reasons to think that the gist of these analyzes is correct.

Allowing the additional subsidies to expire would effectively undo the changes Biden and other Democrats made to the Affordable Care Act, forcing people to pay more for insurance. Some people will end up cutting off their insurance altogether.

To be clear, Republicans have plenty of reasons to accept these results.

They believe that the regulations, spending, and taxes behind large government health programs have an impact. further harm With these newly generous tax credits, they scam. They have never made peace with the Affordable Care Act, even if they have come to downplay the opposition as the program’s popularity has grown. Mr. Trump, in particular, has made no secret of his personal hostility to what is widely considered Mr. Obama’s greatest legislative legacy.

And extending subsidies costs a lot of money. Previous reports put the 10-year net cost at more than $300 billion. CBO estimates. If Republicans are going to add new charges to the federal treasury, they’ve made clear they want to funnel that money into the big tax cuts they want to pass.

But if premiums go up on Republican oversight, they’ll need to explain that to voters, including a significant number of voters in their own states and districts. It turned out that. A case in point is West Virginia, where an unusually large number of people qualify for large tax credits due to a combination of demographic and economic reasons.

“If a 60-year-old, moderate-income couple in West Virginia wanted insurance, they would have to pay an additional $40,000 a year out of pocket,” said Lukens, who led the research and data analysis. say. Focus on budget and policy priorities“Health Team.” “And low-income people who currently don’t have co-pays for insurance will be charged hundreds of dollars.”

If Republicans already have to defend soaring consumer goods prices, it could be even more difficult to explain the premium increases, which most economists believe will happen if President Trump follows through on his promise. I’m predicting it. Huge new tariffs It will affect not only China but also Mexico.

And if Democrats continue to make the choice Republicans are making, which is to enact tax cuts that unfairly benefit corporations, but still support health care for millions of primarily working and middle-class Americans. Emphasizing the option of refusing to extend the term can be particularly difficult. And it cost the federal government much more.

The total amount of tax cuts promised by President Trump over 10 years is trillions of dollarstrivializes the cost of extending additional health insurance subsidies.

Even now, Democrats like Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D.N.H.) are making this argument. “Americans have already“As we face rising prices, we should do everything we can to lower costs wherever and whenever we can,” Shaheen said. press release Thursday after CBO released its findings.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the party leader responsible for health care issues, said, “Republicans need to stop their ideological crusade against the Affordable Care Act and make health care more affordable.” There is an opportunity to work on a bipartisan basis to make it more affordable.” It appears that the government is prepared to give even larger tax cuts to corporations and the wealthy in exchange for working families. ”

Shaheen and Wyden were two of the lawmakers who requested CBO’s analysis this week. The others were Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.) and Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.).

They are among the Democrats in Congress. According to the Washington Postrecently approached Republican leaders about including a one-year extension of additional tax credits in the broader year-end spending bill currently being developed.

The future of that proposal, and of additional tax credits more generally, is impossible to predict at this time. But for Republicans, the question isn’t whether their choices will have a big impact. It’s about which big results they prefer.