As Georgia struggles to find ways to improve its mental health system, which often fails to meet the needs of the state’s children and adults, the Tanner program may offer some clues.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Children at Risk series examines the state of mental and behavioral health services for children and teens across Georgia. It’s a series so far, with more installments to come.
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
The psychiatric program has grown organically, Jenova says.
13 years ago the system opened Willowbrook, the last new mental hospital to open in Georgia. Willowbrook currently operates out of Carrollton, Villa Rica and Cartersville locations. It’s not uncommon for an Atlanta family to drive her an hour outside the city to look after children in Willowbrook.
“We have one of the largest segments of all adolescents. [psychiatry programs] Even within the Atlanta area, you can find it statewide,” Jenova said.
Driven by medical students, residents and fellows From Atlanta and other parts of the state to Western Georgia, For Tanner’s new training program in psychiatry, as it aims to become a statewide academic and clinical resource.
“Tanner is on the cutting edge,” said former state legislator Kevin Tanner, chair of the Georgia Behavioral Health Reform and Innovation Commission. Mental health care for all Georgians. “They are clearly working hard to address this issue.”
overcome barriers
Georgia has a new mental health equality law that requires insurance companies to cover mental health care on par with physical health. State governments rely primarily on nonprofit health care systems to provide services. But few have built robust lines of service for mental health, especially when it comes to children.
The Georgia Children’s Hospital, part of the Georgia Medical College in Augusta, which used to have an inpatient psychiatric bed, has closed. Children’s Health Care in Atlanta also has no inpatient psychiatric beds.
With rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide rising among children in Georgia and across the country, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution is working to ensure that children at risk get the medical care they need to recover. The AJC looked at years of hospitalization statistics, laboratory records, police reports, court records, and state records to understand how the Georgia system works. We examined government hearing records, and public health data. AJC also interviewed mental health providers working in the system, families of children in need of emergency management, hospital executives in multiple states, and policy makers looking for solutions.
Readers who wish to share their experiences related to behavioral and mental health services for children and teens can email research reporter Carrie Teegardin at [email protected] .
That’s why most Georgia hospitals keep psychiatric crisis patients in emergency rooms until they can be transferred. This may take several days. The children are then often sent to independent, for-profit psychiatric hospitals that are part of national chains.
However, these private mental hospitals may block admission to children with chronic physical and mental health problems such as autism, diabetes, and epilepsy.
This is the advantage of sending a child to a hospital that can treat both behavioral health problems and physical ailments at the same time, he said. bradley center Located in Columbus, part of the nonprofit St. Francis Emory Health Care System.
It provides inpatient psychiatric care for children at risk, and officials say there is a growing demand for these services, especially among those who have never been hospitalized for mental health problems. said.
“We know it’s more common, especially among younger people, as it’s associated with suicide attempts and suicidal ideation,” said Brittany Luther-Jones, executive director of the Bradley Center.
Rural communities and Atlanta emergency departments have asked the Bradley Center to take children at risk.
To create a comprehensive system, Tanner knew it needed to: Find ways to overcome two of the reasons other health systems, even the largest ones, hold back mental health efforts..
About 80% of the children and adolescents they see are covered by Medicaid, which tends to pay less. So Tanner operates leaner and has less overhead, he said.
Tanner also has to battle daily with insurance companies that refuse to cover hospitalizations for inpatients or simply won’t pay for days of treatment that children’s doctors believe are essential. These battles continue despite the Equality Act, which requires insurance companies to cover mental health on the same basis as physical health.
Still, it created a system that could financially survive while attracting psychiatrists and other health care workers to work outside of major urban centers. Recruitment was promoted by receiving it.
And by building a robust system, you can respond in the way that makes the most sense to your patients. For example, by building a “partial hospitalization” option, Tanner can have a child in intensive care come to treatment all day and go home in the evening. This will help Tanner avoid hospitalization for her child whenever possible. As children progress, they can descend to lower levels, all within Tanner’s system.
Tanner says it’s driven by maintaining a close relationship with the community and thinking about how much the service can make a difference.
“The overall goal is to keep the community as healthy as possible,” Jenova said. “Respond to it and deal with it.”
This system does not copy other models. That’s because local communities tend to go their own way with the idea of seeing results.
“What happens when you grow up if you don’t take care of your children?” Jenova asked.
“What we are trying to do, especially when it comes to our children and adolescents (services), perhaps this will lead to healthier communities today, five years from now, 10 years from now, 20 years from now. It’s a way to make. We deal with communities. This is where we are. We’re going to keep them here and normalize access to mental health services.”
.
